Bitcoin Cash (BCH) Sportsbooks
Explore the sportsbooks we have reviewed that support Bitcoin Cash (BCH) for deposits, withdrawals or betting-related payments.
Sportsbooks That Support Bitcoin Cash (BCH)
Using Bitcoin Cash (BCH) at Sportsbooks
Bitcoin Cash (BCH) is a peer-to-peer cryptocurrency created on August 1, 2017, following a split from Bitcoin. The fork followed a long-running disagreement over how Bitcoin should scale, with Bitcoin Cash taking an approach focused on processing more transactions directly on the blockchain through increased block capacity.
BCH retains many of Bitcoin’s fundamental characteristics. It is decentralised, uses Proof-of-Work to secure its network and has a maximum supply of approximately 21 million coins. However, its focus on greater on-chain capacity was intended to help Bitcoin Cash function as practical electronic cash, with inexpensive peer-to-peer transactions remaining a central part of its design.
Those characteristics also made BCH a natural fit for crypto betting. Bettors can transfer funds directly between their own wallet and a supporting sportsbook, while relatively inexpensive transactions make it practical for both deposits and withdrawals.
Bitcoin Cash also established an early connection with crypto sports betting. Cloudbet, which had operated as a Bitcoin sportsbook since 2013, introduced BCH in April 2018 as the first alternative cryptocurrency supported by its platform. Players were able to deposit, bet and withdraw directly in Bitcoin Cash rather than having BCH deposits converted into Bitcoin.
That gave BCH a presence in crypto sports betting less than a year after the currency itself was created. Today, Bitcoin Cash no longer has the same profile as Bitcoin or the major stablecoins, but its combination of low-cost transactions and a long history within crypto gambling means it remains a relevant payment option at supporting sportsbooks.
Advantages of Using Bitcoin Cash (BCH)
Advantages
Bitcoin Cash was specifically designed with inexpensive peer-to-peer transactions in mind, and several of those characteristics translate particularly well to sportsbook payments.
- Low transaction fees – BCH transactions are generally inexpensive, making it practical for bettors who don’t want blockchain fees taking a noticeable portion of smaller deposits or withdrawals.
- Suitable for smaller transactions – Low fees make BCH particularly useful when moving relatively modest amounts between a personal wallet and sportsbook.
- Faster practical payments than BTC – Bitcoin Cash’s larger transaction capacity reduces the congestion problems that can make standard Bitcoin transactions slower or more expensive during periods of heavy network demand.
- Established sportsbook support – BCH has been used by crypto gambling operators for years and remains available at a range of sportsbooks. SportsBetting.ag, for example, currently provides dedicated BCH deposits, while Cloudbet has historically supported BCH for sports betting alongside Bitcoin.
- Familiar Bitcoin-style experience – BCH shares much of Bitcoin’s underlying transaction model, making it relatively straightforward for users already comfortable sending and receiving cryptocurrency through conventional wallets.
Drawbacks of Using Bitcoin Cash (BCH)
Drawbacks
Bitcoin Cash works well as a payment cryptocurrency, but there are a few reasons sportsbook users may prefer alternatives.
- Less sportsbook support than Bitcoin – BCH is accepted by multiple betting operators, but Bitcoin remains considerably more established as a sportsbook currency. Restricting yourself to BCH can therefore reduce your choice of operators.
- Price volatility – Like Bitcoin, BCH can move substantially in value. A betting balance held in BCH can gain or lose fiat value regardless of whether your sports bets win or lose.
- Bitcoin/BCH confusion – Despite being separate cryptocurrencies and networks, their similar names and shared history can confuse inexperienced users. Some sportsbook payment instructions specifically warn users to ensure BTC and BCH addresses and funds aren’t mixed up.